| Forward to the Current KOREAN Forum |
| Phrasebase Archive | |
| edwoodseo | Tuesday 23rd of January 2007 11:35:39 AM |
| feel free to dump here any questions on korean language - let\'s discuss korean language | |
| deslite | Friday 16th of March 2007 02:45:03 PM |
| - goodie. ive been really curious about suffixes. is there a trend? im getting a bit confused with the (nida) (chi) and (yo) sometimes i hear the word ani as in (no) but sometimes i hear it used as ani-da, ani-o. ana-chi(?) i dont know if it\'s a stupid question but im a lazy learner, i learn by listening and copying. this holds a set back. | |
| edwoodseo | Friday 16th of March 2007 03:25:13 PM |
| hi,filipina - learn korean by this as well as others like K dramas etc http://hompi.sogang.ac.kr/korean | |
| deslite | Friday 16th of March 2007 03:38:42 PM |
| kamsaminda hanguk saram - cool site. very helpful. actually what i dont understand is the (chi) suffix. (yo) and (imnida). i sorta get. but i wonder about the suffix chi. in this case. ani(o) or ani(da) to just ani. i tried listening to some korean audio file. a polite basic korean converstation. and i havent heard the \'chi\' suffix being used...is \'chi\' suffix a slang? | |
| edwoodseo | Friday 16th of March 2007 05:27:25 PM |
| - hello, eager filipina learner of korean No, chi is not a slang at all its just the ending of the casual speech either when u ask something or when u answer somethin...like aratji(or--chi)? means \'did u get it?\' aratchi(with falling intonation) means \'i get it\' is it help u? what else? | |
| deslite | Friday 16th of March 2007 06:02:07 PM |
| jungmal kamsamida, sensingyim ^^ - it is really helpful. thank you very much. i have yet to read the webpage you suggested. i am still going thru some articles. nanen arachi. hehe. i havent really started learning the romanized version of korean yet. but i can recognize and remember some vowels and consonant now. now, i have a rough idea how the korean language was formed. i think it\'ll be more easy for me to remember hangul. and if i bucthered the romanized korean with my ignorance. forgive me. ill repay it with my proper korean once i get around it. | |
| edwoodseo | Sunday 01st of April 2007 07:49:06 AM |
| hei des - magandang umaga,kumusta glad to meet u learning korean hard yes u r quite right that u are really recommended to learn Hangeul first than romanized, which will guides u more effecient in learning korean language although it would be quite patient to get familiarized and to memorize the letters for the time being when u start it wish ur success in improving ur korean profiency within sooner time ingat ka | |