| Forward to the Current LATIN Forum |
| Phrasebase Archive | |
| BCS | Wednesday 23rd of May 2007 06:23:58 PM |
| POST ON THE LATIN FORUM - In the last three weeks, I have really been the only one posting, here POST NOW! Ego Populusque Phrasebasus! (Senatus Populusque Romanus) I and the people of Phrasebase! | |
| Joe | Wednesday 23rd of May 2007 10:56:09 PM |
| - Cuivis dolori remedium est patientia... | |
| BCS | Thursday 24th of May 2007 04:28:51 AM |
| - Maybe...but I\'m a very impatient kind of guy Joe! | |
| BCS | Thursday 24th of May 2007 04:54:07 AM |
| - Sed, Nihil es Nihil, and in my world: patentia es nihil | |
| Joe | Thursday 24th of May 2007 05:58:36 AM |
| - A link: [url=http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/]The Latin Library[/url] :) | |
| BCS | Thursday 24th of May 2007 06:33:24 AM |
| - That\'s actually pretty cool. THANKS!. I can use it for school for my Latin Research Project | |
| leobloom | Thursday 24th of May 2007 03:52:45 PM |
| - I\'ve also been one of the very few posting here =o/ Our Mod seems to be disappeared =o( btw, no need to use \"ego\" in Latin, and you should remember that in written Latin, when no special emphasis is intended, verb usually goes to the end of the sentence ;) shouldn\'t you already know such things if you\'ve received a national prize for your outstanding knowledge linguae latinae? [i]absit invidia...[/i] | |
| BCS | Thursday 24th of May 2007 05:43:21 PM |
| - Actually you do need the ego in that sentence because there\'s no verb in \"Ego populusque phrasebasus.\" Therefore, if I didn\'t but the \"Ego\" it would mean \"and phrasebasian people.\" Gotchya. | |
| leobloom | Thursday 24th of May 2007 10:01:50 PM |
| - yep you got me there =o) but about that sentence I could even point out that [i]phrasesbasus[/i] might be etimologically wrong and grammatically incorrect :D It simplycan\'t be an adjective coz the words basis,-is and phrasis,-is already exist in Latin laguage. So you could say \"and the people OF PB\" =op Btw, the [i]R.[/i] in S.P.Q.R can be adjective singular or plural (romanus or romani), or even noun in locative case(Romae) and actually in the beginning it didn\'t mean \"of Rome\" but \"of the Quirites\" together with Q. (sorry dunno the English noun for this people) thus resulting in Senatus Populusque Quiritium Romanorum. Quirites was the very first population living in Rome. p.s. I was just letting you know some mistakes you\'ve made there and I was right anyway with the word order, check your post bout \"nihil\" ;)...try not to translate from English to Latin. for the rest \"up with the N.P.P.B. !!!=o)\" | |